Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

September 30, 2009 | Mark Paradies

Three Human Safeguards Fail – Boy Dies Due to Painkiller Overdoes

failed safeguard

He went in for a “routine” dental cleaning and tooth extraction at a hospital in Seattle.

Things went OK. They gave him a prescription for a painkiller.

The doctor (a DDS resident) prescribed it.

The nurse checked it.

The pharmacist checked it.

The prescription was slightly unusual – a fentanyl transdermal patch. The doctor decided to use this pain reliever because the boy was autistic and could not tolerate liquid or pill-form medication.

What all three people failed to notice was that this form of medication was highly potent and was only used by people who had already built up a tolerance to opioids. Otherwise, these drugs can kill by stopping respiration.

But the doctor, the nurse, and the pharmacist missed this.

Now it gets interesting.

The doctor performing the surgery didn’t prescribe the medicine. Instead, a resident that was assisting wrote the prescription. It isn’t clear if the doctor performing the surgery reviewed the prescription or not.

Some questions that weren’t answered by the article:

– How many hours had the resident worked? (Was fatigue an issue?)

– How did the resident pick that drug?

– How did the packaging and prescription tools warn about the care needed in prescribing and using this drug?

The hospital’s corrective action was to add more human action safeguards around the prescription of this drug (additional reviews).

What do you think? Is this sufficient?

Categories
Root Cause Analysis
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *