Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

June 22, 2022 | Barb Carr

Repeat-back Can Save a Life

repeat-back

Repeat-back (sometimes referred to as 3-way communication) is used to ensure the information shared during a work process is clear and complete. It’s a simple concept with the power to save a life. When evaluating whether or not repeat-back should be part of a work process, it’s important to consider what could happen if it’s not. Do any of these five poor communication scenarios sound familiar?

  1. The worker made assumptions about an unclear message based on his/her experience or expectation.
  2. A worker chose poor words for communication.
  3. A worker delivered messages that were too long to remember.
  4. The message was not delivered by the worker in the receiver’s primary language.
  5. A message was delivered in the same language but by a worker from a different geographical region so the words did not sound the same across regions and were misunderstood.

Any of the communication mistakes above can lead to serious consequences that repeat-back could help avoid.

Communication
Human errors often occur because workers don’t hear or understand what needed to be done, not because they are not capable of doing the work error-free.

We are not as good at listening and remembering as we think we are.

Repeat-back should be used when essential detail must be communicated as well as meaning. In the repeat-back process, the sender initiates the communication using the receiver’s name, the receiver repeats the information back, and the sender acknowledges the accuracy of the repeat back or repeats the communication if it is not accurate. This technique may be required by policy or procedure and reinforced during training on a task for better compliance.

As mentioned above, (and worth repeat-back) human errors often occur because workers don’t hear or understand what needed to be done, not because they are not capable of doing the work error-free. By repeating the message back, communications are strengthened, and getting the job done right is more likely.

In our 5-Day TapRooT® Advanced Root Cause Analysis Team Leader Training, students perform a communications exercise that drives this message home in a fun way. This reinforces their knowledge of the Communications Basic Cause Category on the TapRooT® Root Cause Tree. A little understanding of this category of root causes goes a long way in fixing communication errors. You don’t have to be a communications expert, just follow the expert TapRooT® Root Cause Analysis Process.

Join us to learn more about communication problems that lead to incidents, and how to fix them. We have courses coming up this summer in Perth, Australia, Monterrey, Mexico, Lake Tahoe, Nevada and Dallas, Texas.

View our upcoming courses worldwide.

And keep in mind … using repeat-back is one of the easiest ways to avoid incidents stemming from poor communication. Ensure your management team is enforcing this technique where it is essential.

Categories
Safety
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *