Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

November 28, 2018 | Mark Paradies

Process Safety in the Oil Industry – Are These Unacceptable Performance Indicators?

I’ve written about Admiral Rickover and his approach to process safety (see these articles). Those who read the articles know Rickover would consider the following examples from UK HSE inspections (from North Sea oil drilling, production, and processing) unacceptable indicators of process safety performance:

What do you think? Are these unacceptable process safety performance indicators?

What would Admiral Rickover expect? Try these results…

  • ZERO stuck critical safety valves.
  • Only qualified watch standers.
  • All safety critical maintenance complete.
  • Lifts that don’t fail because of proper planning and equipment.

Those are the standards Rickover would set for the Nuclear Navy.

I guarantee that problems like those found by the UH HSE would have resulted in a blistering “counseling session” by Admiral Rickover to the Commanding Officer of the ship or sub. If it was a repeated … the CO would be gone (relieved for cause). Rickover would expect that problems would be found and corrected locally long before a regulatory inspection.

What standards do you accept?

Are your problems found and corrected locally?

Do you have unacceptable process safety performance indicators?

What are the root causes of these failures?

Is it time to set higher standards and achieve much better performance?

NOW is the time to improve process safety performance by learning about best practices from around the world at the 2019 Global TapRooT® Summit coming up on March 11-15 in Houston (Montgomery), Texas. See the complete schedule here:

https://summit.taproot.com/schedule

Read about the Keynote Speakers here:

http://www.taproot.com/summit/keynote-speakers/

Mark Paradies is giving a talk in the Performance Excellence Track titled:

Admiral Rickover & High Reliability Organization

If you want to learn more about achieving perfect process safety? Attend the session (1:30 – 2:30 on Wednesday) and take home lessons learned.

Register for the 2019 Global TapRooT® Summit here:

https://summit.taproot.com/register

Categories
Operational Excellence, Summit
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *