Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

December 5, 2017 | Mark Paradies

Not Near-Misses … They Are Precursors

Precursor Incidents

I had an epiphany today.

Have you ever noticed how management doesn’t take near-miss incidents seriously? They don’t see them as just one step away from a fatality?

I think part of the problem may be the terminology.

A near-miss doesn’t sound very serious. After all … it was a miss.

near-miss

But what if we called these incidents PRECURSORS? Precursor Incidents!

It is Going to Happen

A precursor tells you that something IS going to happen unless you change.

near-miss?

If management saw these incidents as an indicator that something was GOING TO HAPPEN, then maybe, they would take action.

You may have already thought of this and changed the language that you use around incidents … but I haven’t seen the words PRECURSOR INCIDENTS used very often. Now may be the time for TapRooT® Users to start using Precursor Incidents in their language.

What Aren’t Precursors?

One more thing … Precursor Incidents mean that incidents that could not cause an accident ARE NOT precursors. Thus, paper cuts are not precursors of amputations.

Therefore, we can stop wasting our time investigating incidents that will never cause a serious injury. We will only investigate precursor incidents and accidents with actual consequences.

consequences - near-miss?
Are these consequences enough to call this an accident OR is it a precursor incident?

Also, real accidents that have consequences aren’t precursors incidents. They are real accidents.

Just a thought … What do you think?

Categories
Root Cause Analysis
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *