Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

July 15, 2024 | Susan Napier-Sewell

Lessons Learned: Slingsby Glider Mid-air Collision

Slingsby glider

AAIB (Air Accidents Investigations Branch) investigated the mid-air collision of a Slingsby glider (WB 924) with an unmanned aircraft.

During the approach to Dunstable Airfield, Bedfordshire, the Slingsby glider was struck by a small, unmanned aircraft (UA) that from the memory card recovered from the UA showed that it was intentionally flown close to the glider.

The Slingsby glider sustained superficial damage to the surface of the wing.

History of the flight

On the approach to land at Dunstable Airfield, at approximately 100 ft agl, the pilot and passenger in WB 924 saw a small UA which several seconds later passed close to the head of the passenger and struck the leading edge of the left wing. The glider landed safely, and the damage was later assessed as “cosmetic.” The glider pilot reported that the UA was flown from a ridge, east of the airfield.

The UA fell to the ground and was retrieved by two young individuals who shared the UA log and video footage with a witness. The log and video show that the UA was flown on the direct approach path of the glider, and the glider was in view of the camera on the UA. Figure 1 is an image taken from the UA video just prior to impact. The video also shows that the UA was being flown from a public car park locate

Operation of unmanned aircraft
UA involved in the accident

From a photograph of the UA, taken by a witness after the accident, it was identified as a DJI Mini 2, which is equipped with a camera and weighs 249 g. The images supplied to the AAIB did not display an Operator ID, nor was an ID reported to the AAIB.

Regulations and guidance

WB 924 A UA is classified as an aircraft and the Air Navigation Order Article 241 states: AAIB-29662 “A person must not recklessly or negligently cause or permit an aircraft to endanger any person property.” The Regulations for the operation of UAs are in UK Regulation (EU) 2019/947. The CAA have published guidance material in The Drone Code1.

The Code states that for a UA below a weight of 250 g, and equipped with a camera, an Operator ID is required, which must be labeled on the UA. Operators must be 18 years or over to obtain an Operator ID. Younger pilots can still fly the UA under the supervision of their guardian or parent, providing they register for an Operator ID.

Conclusion

The midair collision occurred because the UA was intentionally flown on the approach path of the glider. Operation of the UA required an Operator ID, but the pilots were both too young to obtain one.

Read the full AAIB report: “AAIB investigation to Slingsby T.21B, WB 924.”

Categories
Accident, Investigations
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *