Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

June 30, 2010 | Mark Paradies

The Wall Street Journal Reports: “Safety and Cost Drives Clashed As CEO Hayward Remade BP”

A very interesting article in The Wall Street Journal. See:

https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703964104575335154126721876.html

Some interesting quotes…

Meanwhile, company officials continued hammering home the message on costs. Mr. Shaw, the Gulf of Mexico head, made the point at a meeting for top managers in Phoenix in April 2008. His aim, according to an internal BP communication, was to instill a ‘much stronger performance culture’ in the organization, based on strictly managing costs and ‘this notion that every dollar does matter.'”

– – –

A former BP engineer who retired last year said the Gulf of Mexico operation under Mr. Shaw became focused on meeting performance targets, which determined bonuses for top managers and low-level workers alike. The engineer says even small costs got targeted: BP no longer provided food at lunch meetings and eliminated the fruit bowls that were offered as part of a healthy-living drive a few years earlier.

– – –

Talking about pipeline leaks in Alaska … “The state [Alaska] also said it was ‘deeply concerned with the timeliness and depth of the incident investigation’ conducted by BP. It took four months to provide a report that other oil companies typically submit in two weeks.”

– – –

Some think the cost drive affected safety. Workers had ‘high incentive to find shortcuts and take risks,’ says Ross Macfarlane, a former BP health and safety manager on rigs in Australia who was laid off in 2008. ‘You only ever got questioned about why you couldn’t spend less—never more.’ BP vigorously denies putting savings ahead of safety.

– – –

In a different context, BP had questioned the impact of its cost-cutting in the Gulf. After the 2008 incident on the Atlantis platform, BP’s internal report warned of lax safety oversight and tight budgets.

It concluded: ‘A key question to ask, especially with apparently minor and disconnected defects, is ‘What’s the worst thing that could happen?””

Categories
Accident
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *