Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

August 6, 2014 | Barb Carr

Root Cause Analysis Video Tip: Conduct Real-Time Peer Reviews

TapRooT® Co-Creator Mark Paradies shares the some best practices for conducting peer reviews. Watch it above, and print out the notes below for future reference:

You don’t want to wait until you’ve finished your investigation to conduct a peer review. We’ve seen a lot of resistance to change at this point, since so much work has already gone into the investigation. Instead, conduct peer reviews at various stages of the investigation.

Here are four stages that are great times to evaluate investigators, and some guidelines on what to look for:

1. After Creating Summer SnapCharT® – Is the SnapCharT® thorough enough or do we need more interviews & data?

2. After Defining Causal Factors – Are they at the right end of the cause-and-effect chain? – Was a Safeguards Analysis conducted? – Were all the failed safeguards identified as causal factors?

3. After RCA and Generic Cause Analysis – Did they use their tools (Root Cause Tree®, Root Cause Tree® Dictionary, etc.)? – Did they find good root causes? – Did they find generic causes? – Did they have evidence for each root cause?

4. After Developing Corrective Actions – Use corrective action helper to determine effectiveness of corrective actions.

You may not want to conduct these peer reviews during every investigation, because it can become time-consuming. Ask these questions for new investigators and during major investigations. Another pro tip: Use your most experienced investigators to conduct peer reviews. In addition to improving the quality of your investigation step-by-step, you also gain the opportunity to sharpen the investigation skills of the investigators and the reviewers.

Join us in two weeks for another Root Cause Tip video, this time from TapRooT® Instructor Dave Janney.

Click here to learn more about the TapRooT® System.

===============

Was this tip helpful? Check out more short videos in our series:

Do Better Investigations with Dave Janney (Click here to view tip.)

What Makes a World-Class Root Cause Analysis System with Ken Reed (Click here to view tip.)

TapRooT® & Healthcare: Getting the Most from Your Sentinel Event Investigation with Ed Skompski (Click here to view tip.)

Categories
Root Cause Analysis
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *