Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

May 7, 2007 | Mark Paradies

Monday Accident & Lessons Learned: Do Heads Need to Roll to Make People Happy?

After a major flooding incident at a mine in Canada, Cameco published a report on their root cause analysis of the accident. The Regina Leader-Post published an article about the report and the reaction of some financial analysts that I thought was quite interesting.

First, the article said:

“The root-cause report into that flood concluded neither Cameco nor its contractor had identified risk scenarios, nor did they have necessary controls in place to prevent the flooding of the shaft.”

Later in the article, it provided some quotes from analysts. One analyst was quoted as follows:

“William Vogel, an analyst with Harbor View Growth Equity Management in Connecticut, said Cameco appeared to have a ‘lax’ corporate culture. He said he would have expected the company would ‘have fired a lot of people,’ considering that lives were at stake in the mine. ‘I don’t think you have a standards problem. I think you have a people problem,’ Vogel said.”

What can you learn from this article?

Some people just aren’t happy until heads roll (discipline is taken by firing people).

This brings up the whole issue of the basis of performance improvement.

Do we BLAME incidents on people and fire them to improve performance OR do we find the system problems and fix them to ensure improved performance?

It seems that the analyst is in the blame camp. Without performing an investigation, he knew the answer … fire a lot of people!

Where does your corporate performance improvement philosophy fall? Is it oriented toward blame or system improvements? And what approach will yield the best long-term results? This could be a major lesson learned!

Categories
Root Cause Analysis
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *